Comparing stability of snap bean genotypes
Downloads
Published
Keywords:
Snap bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., genotypes, environments, pod yield, stability and genotype x environmentIssue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Indian Journal of Horticulture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Six new Snap bean varieties viz.,’HAFB-3’, ‘HAFB-4’,‘DWD-FB-1’,’Arka Anoop’,‘VLFB-2004’ and ‘VLFB- 130’ were evaluated for three years along with checks viz., ‘IIHR-909’ and ‘Contender’ during 2005, 2006 and 2007 to study the genotype-environment interaction and stability for growth and yield traits at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka. The varieties were sown in randomized block design with three replication within each season. Considerable amount of variability was noticed among the genotypes as there was a significant varietal difference. Significant mean squares due to environments for many of the traits indicated that the environments were different. Similarly, G X E (linear) were nonsignificant for many of the traits except average pod weight indicating that the genotypes responded similarly as the environments changes. And, the magnitude of regression coefficient and deviation from regression varied from genotype to genotype. The genotypes ‘DWD-FB-1’ and ‘HAFB-3’ are stable for many of the traits and these are suitable to cultivate in kharif season.
How to Cite
Downloads
Similar Articles
- Lalu Prasad Yadav, Avtar Singh, S.K. Malhotra, Growth, yield and quality response of organic broccoli to intercrops and crop geometry , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 73 No. 03 (2016): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Anant Bahadur, A.K. Singh, K.P. Singh, Effect of planting systems and mulching on soil hydrothermal regime, plant physiology, yield and water use efficiency in tomato , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 70 No. 01 (2013): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Azeze Seyie, I.S. Naruka, P.P. Singh, S.S. Kushwah, Nutrient management and its effect on growth, yield and quality of ginger cultivars , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 70 No. 01 (2013): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- B.D. Tamboli, D.D. Sawale, P.B. Jagtap, R.U. Nimbalkar, S.R. Teke, Effect of micronutrients on yield and fruit quality of fig on Inceptisol , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 03 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Arpita Srivastava, Manisha Mangal, Gokul Gosavi, Pritam Kalia, Characterization of cultivated and wild species of Capsicum using microsatellite markers , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 75 No. 02 (2018): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- R.K. Patel, C.S. Maiti, Bidyut C. Deka, S.S. Roy, V.K. Verma, Genetic diversity among guava genotypes based on seed protein polymorphism , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 70 No. 2 (2013): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- P. Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, S.V. Singh, S.K. Pandey, Standardizing fertility and crop geometry requirements of potato chipping variety Kufri Chipsona-4 for higher chip grade yield, quality and profitability , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 02 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- N. Mtumtum, A.T. Modi, Effect of plant population and mulching on wild watermelon growth and yield , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 71 No. 4 (2014): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- A.K. Singh, Rakesh Singh, Analysis of genetic relationships of Indian grape genotypes using RAPD markers , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 68 No. 03 (2011): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Rajbir Singh, R.R. Sharma, D.B. Singh, Effect of vermicompost on plant growth, fruit yield and quality of strawberries in irrigated arid region of northern plains , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 67 No. 03 (2010): Indian Journal of Horticulture
<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.