Delineating the genetic variability, inter-relationship and morphological variations in water chestnut for nut yield and mineral composition

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2024.81.4.9

Keywords:

Trapa spp., water chestnut, variability, correlation, minerals.
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 81 No. 04 (2024): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Indian Journal of Horticulture

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Rakesh Dubey ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi
  • Jyoti Devi
  • N. Rai
  • T.K. Behera

Abstract

The fresh, edible fruit-nut of the water chestnut, an annual herb found in water, is an important aquatic crop. There is an enormous variation in water chestnut growth and yield, which is not extensively recorded in India. The yield performance of 23 water chestnut lines was examined in the present investigation. Crop variability contributes to the effective application of plant characteristics in the creation of stable and productive cultivars. The present study was conducted in 2020-2021 on water chestnut (Trapa spp.) accessions in order to assess the degree of genetic variability and yield character relationships. The genotypic coefficient of variation and heritability estimations were high for Zn, Mn and Fe content in rind, number of spines per nut, pedicel length, 10 dried nut rind weight, number of leaves per plant, number of nuts per plant, leaf length and fresh nut yield per plant. The following traits showed low heritability estimates and genotypic coefficients of variation: leaf width, nut pedicel length, weight of a single fresh nut, weight of a single shelled nut, and TSS. Fresh nut yield per plant was positively and significantly associated with the number of leaves per plant and the weight of 10 fresh nuts. To improve fruit-nut yield in water chestnut, selection criteria such as number of leaves per plant, number of nuts per plant, fruit pedicel length, fresh nut weight, TSS, 10 fresh nut weight and 10 fresh nut rind weight could be applied in different crop improvement programmes of water chestnut.

How to Cite

Dubey, R., Devi, J., Rai, N., & Behera, T. (2024). Delineating the genetic variability, inter-relationship and morphological variations in water chestnut for nut yield and mineral composition. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 81(04), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2024.81.4.9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Jibouri, H. W., Miller, P.A. and Robinson, H.F. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variance and co-variance in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron. J. 50: 633–37.

2. Babu, M. and Dwivedi, D. H. 2012. Evaluation of biochemical attributes in water chestnut collected from Lucknow region. The Asian J. Hort. 7: 442-44.

3. Babu, M., Dwivedi, D. H., Yogita and Ram, R. B. 2011. Studies on physico-chemical traits of local water chestnut germplasm under centeral Uttar Pradesh. Plant Arch. 11: 949-51.

4. Beigh, M. A., Hussain, S. Z., Naseer, B., Rouf, A. and Wani, F. 2020.Grade classification for water chestnuts, their dimensional properties and correlation analysis. J. Sci. & Ind Res. 79: 66-70.

5. Burton, G.W. and DeVane, E.W. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron. J. 45:478–81.

6. Chandana, M., Rupa, M. and Chakraborthy, G. S. 2013. A review of potential of plants under Trapa species. Int. J. Res. Phar. and Chem. 3: 502-08.

7. Comstock, R.E. and Robinson, H.F.1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. In:Heterosis. Ames: Iowa State College Press; p. 494–16.

8. Dubey, R. K., Singh, P. M. and Singh, J. 2020.Water chestnut. Indian Hort. 65 : 126.

9. Falconer, D. S.1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd ed. London, England: Longman.

10. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research, 2nd ed. International Rice Research Institute. JohnWiley and Sons Inc.

11. Gond, M., Dwivedi, D. H., Singh, N. and Dwivedi, S. K. 2020. Morphological characterization and SEM analysis of intervarietal variability in water chestnut (Trapa natans var. bispinosa Roxb.) collections. Acta Hortic. 1297: 181-86.

12. Hanson, L. N.and Earle, E. D.1956. Transfer of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris into Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. by protoplast fusion. Theor Appl. Genet. 91: 1293–00.

13. Jana, B. R. 2020. Agronomic management of water chestnut ( Trapa natans L.): A review. Int. J. Curr. Micro. Appl. Sci. 9 : 2773-77.

14. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E.1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 47:314–18.

15. Lam, D. T., Kataoka, T., Yamagishi, H., Sun, G., Udatsu, T., Tanaka, K. and Ishikawa, R. 2024. Origin of domesticated water chestnuts (Trapa bispinosa Roxb.) and genetic variation in wild water chestnuts. Eco. Evo. 2024;14:e10925.

16. Morico, G., Grasi, F. and Fideghelli, C. 1998. Horticultural genetic diversity: Conservation and sustainable utilization and related international agreements. World Conference on Horticultural Research, Rome, 17–20.

17. Pasala, R. and Rajithasri, M. 2022. Water chestnut: Growing conditions, nutritional and phytochemical composition, novel extraction methods and health properties. The Pharma Inno. J. 11 : 599-12.

18. Singh, B.D. 2001. Plant breeding: Principles and methods. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers

19. Singh, R. K. and Chaudhary, B.D. 1985. Biometrical methods of quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

20. Suriyagoda, L., Arima, S., Suzuki, A. and Hoque. 2007. Variation in growth and yield performance of Seventeen water chestnut accessions collected from Asia and Europe. Plant Prod. Sci. 10: 372-79.

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>