Comparative analysis of vegetable production, value-addition and marketing in National Capital Region

Published

2023-02-08

Keywords:

Economic analysis, motivators, constraints, vegetable production, value-addition.
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Reshma Gills Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

Abstract

Agriculture, especially vegetable sector needs streamlined supply chain in the form of well functioning marketing infrastructure to make ‘farm’ to ‘fork’ model as reality. In the present study, field survey was carried out to identify different existing marketing channels among vegetable producers and processors. Marketing efficiency and price spread of the identified marketing channels were analysed. Producer’s share in consumer’s price significantly differed among vegetable processors (61%) and producers (30%). Acharya’s marketing efficiency analysis method showed that Channel I (Processor/ producer-Consumer) was most efficient marketing channel with maximum profit to both processors and producers. Most important motivating factor identified among processor to go for value addition of vegetable produce was price of value added products (Mean ranks of Friedman's test is 12.15). Financial constraint (mean rank of Kruskal-Wallis's test 33.35) to start and run a processing unit was the major constraint faced by the vegetable processors. Under that lack of price policy (mean ranks of Friedman's test is 7.65) was identified as the major constraint in the study area. Marketing related factor was (mean rank of Kruskal-Wallis's test 45.50) identified as major inhibitor among growers to undertake processing of vegetable by their own.

How to Cite

Reshma Gills. (2023). Comparative analysis of vegetable production, value-addition and marketing in National Capital Region. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 73(1), 87–93. Retrieved from https://journal.iahs.org.in/index.php/ijh/article/view/608

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2012. Times of India. http://

timesofindia.indiatimes.com. Retrieved on

/03/2013.

Cheng, Casey and Kari, A.W. 2014. New practicebased tool for making decisions on investment

in PHL reduction. http://publish.illinois.edu/

phlinstitute/2014/08/28/new-practice-basedtool-for-making-decisions-on-investment-in-phlreduction/.

Kader, A.A. and Rolle, R.S. 2004. The role of postharvest management in assuring the quality and

safety horticultural crops, Food and Agriculture

Organization. Agricultural Services Bulletin. 152:

p.

Kitinoja, L.S., Saran, S.K. and Kader, A.A.

Postharvest technology for developing

countries: challenges and opportunities in

research, outreach and advocacy. J. Sci. Food

Agric. 91: 597-603. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/

datastore/234-1922.pdf.

Nanda, S.K., Vishwakarma, R.K., Bathla, H.V.L.,

Rai, A. and Chandra, P. 2012. Harvest and

postharvest losses of major crops and livestock

produce in India. AICRP on PHT, CIPHET

(ICAR), Ludhiana.

NHB. 2015. Indian Horticulture Data Base. http://

nhb.gov.in/area-pro/NHB_Database_2015.pdf

Sinha, R.K. 2010. Emerging Trends,

Challenges and Opportunities presentation,

on publications page, slides 7 through 21.

National Seed Association of India http://www.

nsai.co.in/Publication/exec/frmAllPublication.

aspx?cID=Presentations

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.