Effect of different preservatives on shelf life of cut tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.)
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.2.18Keywords:
Tuberose, vase life, preservative, sucrose, citric acid, AgNO3Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MURUGANANTHAM M MALAYALAM, R. Devanathan, Saran Kumar K, Balaaji V S, Yazhini R, Harini G, Hemalatha M, Shashank B, Poornima S, Lakshmi Narayanan R, ShathishBaabu G, Vinothagan S., Parthiban S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Tuberose is an important cut flower crop in Indian as well as world. But, postharvest senescencse is unduced by several factors viz., water stress, carbohydrate deplelion, micro organism. Improvement of keeping quality and extension of vase life of cut flowers are important areas in floricultural research. Postharvest senescence is induced by several factors like water stress, carbohydrate depletion, microorganism etc. It has been reported that pulsing treatments prevents vascular infections and inhibit ethylene production and thereby result in prolong storage period and higher quality flowers with increased vase life. The study was conducted during the period July to August 2024 to find out suitable preservative(s) of vase solution that increases vase life of tuberose (CV. Single). Eleven treatments viz., T1 = Control, T2 = Sucrose 2.5%, T3 = Sucrose 5%, T4 = Citric acid 2.5%, T5 = Citric acid 5%, T6 = AgNO3 15 ppm, T7 = AgNO3 30 ppm, T8 = Sucrose 2.5% + Citric acid 2.5%, T9 = Sucrose 2.5% + Citric acid 5%, T10 = Sucrose 2.5% + AgNO3 15 ppm and T11 = Sucrose 5% + AgNO3 25 ppm. Experimental results revealed that different preservatives solutions significantly affected the vase-life of tuberose flowers. The combination and concentration of Sucrose 2.5% and AgNO3 15 ppm (T10) were found to most suitable preservative solution for extending the vase life of tuberose cut flowers.Abstract
How to Cite
Downloads
1. Adarsh, K., Sanjeev, K. and Chandra, S. 2010. Vase life studies in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa) cv. Shringar as affected by postharvest handling treatments. J. Asian Hort. 5 (1): 7-10. 2. Baidya, B. K., Chakrabarty, S. and Sethy, P. 2020. Extending shelf life of loose tuberose florets (Polianthes tuberosa Linn. cv. Prajwal) by quick dipping in boric acid and sodium benzoate followed by low temperature storage. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 8(3): 2607-2612. 3. Halevy, A. H. and Mayank. 1976. Treatments to improve water balance of cut flowers. Acta Hort. 64: 223-226. 4. Hutchinson, M. J., Chebet, D. K. and Emongor, V. E. 2003. Effect of accel, sucrose and silver thiosulphate on the water relations and postharvest physiology of cut tuberose flowers. Afr.Crop Sci. J. 11(4): 279-287. 5. Jadhav, P. B. and Gurav, N. P. 2018. Extension of the storage and post-storage life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa) loose flowers cv. ‘Local’. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(1): 2798-2807. 6. Jowkar, M. M. and Salehi, H. 2003. Effects of different preservative solutions on the vase life of cut tuberose flowers at usual home conditions. In VIII Int. Symp. Postharvest Physiol. Ornament. Plants. 669: 411-416. 7. Kumar, V., Battacharjee, S. K., Rajive Kumar, R., Misra, L. and Krishnan. P. S. 2003. Postharvest and quality of tuberose spikes as affected by colouring agents and storage. J. Ornamental Hort. 6(2): 119. 8. Kumari, S., Raghupathi, B., Sarika, K. and Deb, P. 2018. Effect of different preservatives on vaselife of cut tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Calcultta Single. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(1): 1651-1657. 9. Mahroo, S. M. and Ashari, E. M. 2009. Effect of different concentrations of four preservatives solutions on tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cut flower vase life. J. Flori. Ornam. Biotechnol. 3(1): 59-61. 10. Motaghayer, M. S. and Esna-Ashari, M. 2009. Effect of different concentrations of four preservative solutions on tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cut flower vase-life. FOB. 3(1): 59-61. 11. Paul, D., Jannat, A., Mahmud, A. A., Akhter, M. J. and Mahmood, S. 2021. Preservative solutions on vase life and quality of cut Polianthes tuberosa L. Ornam. Hortic. 27: 417-424. 12. Reethu, G. R., Jhalegar, M. J., Jagadeesh, S. L., Bhuvaneshwari, G., Babu, A. G. and Pavankumar, P. 2022. Effect of pre-cooling methods on shelf life of cold stored tuberose florets. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 11(5): 181-185. 13. Sao, B. and Verma, L. S. 2020. Review on impact of different preservative solutions on vase-life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cut flowers. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 9(1):1185-1188. 14. Sigma, T. N., Hoque, M. A. and Hossain, M. M. 2018. Effect of different preservatives on vase life of tuberose. J. Crop Sci. Technol. 7(3): 10-15. 15. Singh, A. K. and Shankar, K. 2011. Effect of plant growth regulators on vegetative growth and flowering behaviour of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Double. Plant Arch. 11: 123-125. 16. Talukdar, M. C. and Barooah, L. 2011. Effect of pulsing and different holding solutions flower quality and vase life of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Calcutta Double. J. Ind. Hill Farm. 24(1): 31-33. 17. Uddina, A. J., Khanb, P., Mehrajc, H., Taufiquea, T. and Shiama, I. H. 2016. Influence of different pulsing and holding solutions on vase life of tuberose. J. Biosci. Agric. Res. 7(1): 578-582. 18. Vidhya, S. and Bhattacharjee, S. K. 2002. Floriculture research trend in India. Indian Soc. Ornamental Hort. New Delhi, pp. 83-86.
References
Similar Articles
- D.P. Sharma, H.R. Sharma, N. Sharma, Evaluation of apple cultivars under sub-temperate mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 02 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- N.D. Negi, S.K. Upadhyay, Evaluation of different blueberry genotypes under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 02 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Angrej Singh, Arun Kaushal, Sunil Garg, Neena Chawla, Effect of different coloured plastic mulches on growth, yield and quality of drip fertigated bell pepper (Capsicum annum var. grossum) , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 02 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Purbashree Hazarika, Deepa Borbora Phookan, Sapna Barua, Performance of cauliflower as influenced by organic inputs and microbial consortium , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 01 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- S.D. Shikhamany, Sanjay K. Jeughale, Kailas N. Khapre, Response of 2A Clone grape to GA3 sprays for berry thinning as influenced by cane regulation on two training systems under tropical conditions , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 01 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Sarvpriya Singh, Nav Prem Singh, B.V.C Mahajan, Gurupkar Singh Sidhu, Response of strawberry fruits to low temperature and ambient storage conditions , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 78 No. 01 (2021): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Deeksha Gautam, S.K Jain, P Bhatnagar, Nirmal Meena, Hemraj Chippa, Utilization of custard apple pulp for preparation of blended nectar , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 78 No. 02 (2021): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Manpreet Singh Preet, Rajesh Kumar, V.P Singh, Neha ., Ankit Dongariyal, Ranjan Srivastava, Response of guava to integrated nutrient and water management , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 78 No. 02 (2021): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- A. K. Dubey, Anjana Kholia, Nimisha Sharma, R. M. Sharma, Assessing genetic diversity in Indian pummelo collections utilizing quantitative traits and simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs) , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 78 No. 01 (2021): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- P.S. Gurjar, S.R. Singh, A.K. Verma, S. Rajan, Reduction of browning in minimally processed lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 79 No. 02 (2022): Indian Journal of Horticulture
<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.