Genetic diversity and cluster analysis of dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) in the Bundelkhand region using multivariate statistical techniques

Published

2025-06-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.2.4

Keywords:

Genotypes, heatmap, ward’s clustering, PCA, tocher clustering, crop improvement
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Arjun singh Department of Vegetable Science, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8852-5180
  • Ajai Kumar Panday Department of Vegetable Science, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Maneesh Panday Department of Vegetable Science, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Gourav Sharma Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003
  • Rutuja Nale Department of Fruit Science, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003
  • Sajeel Ahamad Division of Food Science & Postharvest Technology, ICAR- Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, India,110012
  • Devesh Kumar Division of Food Science & Postharvest Technology, ICAR- Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, India,110012
  • Awani Kumar Singh Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India, 110 012

Abstract

Dolichos bean is a nutritionally and agronomically important legume with significant genetic variability. This study assessed the genetic diversity among 21 genotypes from the Bundelkhand region using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering under a Randomized Block Design (RBD). PCA revealed that the first three principal components accounted for 67.85% of the total variance, with PC1 contributing 32.41%, PC2 21.73%, and PC3 13.71%. Hierarchical clustering grouped genotypes into five distinct clusters, with the highest inter-cluster distance (5698.57) observed between cluster 4 and cluster 5, indicating high genetic divergence. Cluster 5 exhibited superior pod yield traits, while cluster 3 recorded the highest dry matter content (42.47%) and seed weight (26.73 g), making them valuable for breeding programs. These findings highlight the genetic diversity in dolichos bean and provide valuable insights for breeding high-yielding and stress-tolerant cultivars. The study supports sustainable genetic improvement programs in India, particularly in the Bundelkhand region.

How to Cite

singh, A., Ajai Kumar Panday, Maneesh Panday, Gourav Sharma, Rutuja Nale, Sajeel Ahamad, … Awani Kumar Singh. (2025). Genetic diversity and cluster analysis of dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) in the Bundelkhand region using multivariate statistical techniques. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 82(02), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.2.4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adu, M. O., Asare, P. A., Yawson, D. O., Dzidzienyo, D. K., Nyadanu, D., Asare, B. E., Afutu, E., Tachie-Menson, J. W, and Amoah, M. N. 2019. Identifying key contributing root system traits to genetic diversity in field-grown cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) genotypes. Field Crops Res. 232: 106–118.

2. Akshaya, M., Geetha, K., Nirmalakumari, A., Sharavanan, P. T., Sivakumar, C. and Parasuraman, P. 2023. Genetic variability, correlation, and principal component analysis for yield related traits in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Legume Res. 1: 5.

3. Barathi, M., Bala, D., Ratna Babu, J., Sateesh Babu, S., Khayum Ahammed, and Srinivasa, R. V. 2024. Classification of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] germplasm based on the genetic differences for yield attributing traits. Vegetos. 37: 2627-2635.

4. Basu, S., Gopalan, C. and Ramasastri, B.V. 2002. Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research.

5. Gangadhara, K., Yadav, L. P., Rao, V. A., Singh, A. K., Verma, A. K., Selvakumar, R. and Jat, G. S. 2024. Genetic diversity and principal component analysis in Indian bean (Lablab purpureus var. typicus L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Western India. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 71:1421-1434.

6. Gerrano, A. S., Adebola, P. O., Jansen Van Rensburg, W. S. and Laurie, S. M. 2015. Genetic variability in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) genotypes. S. Afr. J.Plant Soil. 32: 165–174.

7. Gerrano, A. S., Jansen, Van Rensburg, W. S. and Kutu, F. R. 2019. Agronomic evaluation and identification of potential cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes in South Africa. Acta. Agric. Scand. Sect B-Soil Plant Sci. 69:295–303.

8. Gopalan, C., Ramasastri, B.V. and Balasubramanian, S.C. 1996. Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR.

9. Ibrahim, M.S., Shuaibu, K. and Mohammed, M. 2008. Nutritional composition of Dolichos lablab. Food Chem. 4: 75-82.

10. Kiran, V., Ola, A. L., Tiwari, D., Sharma, G., Kumar, S. and Singh, S. 2024. Morpho-phenological characterization and genetic analysis of dolichos bean germplasm from Uttar Pradesh, India. Plant Genet. Resour. 22: 133-142.

11. Magalingam, P., Kannan, R. and Suresh, P. 2013. Genetic diversity analysis of Dolichos bean using morphological and molecular markers. Plant Breed. Genet. J. 8: 123-135.

12. Meena, R. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability for horticultural and quality traits in Dolichos bean [lablab purpureus (l.) Sweet].

13. Mofokeng, M. A., Mashilo, J., Rantso, P. and Shimelis, H. 2020. Genetic variation and genetic advance in cowpea based on yield and yieldrelated traits. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B, Soil Plant Sci. 70: 381–391.

14. Nayak, N.J., Maurya, P.K., Maji, A., Chatterjee, S., Mandal, A.R. and Chattopadhyay, A. 2017. Estimation of genetic parameters and selection of parents for hybridization in dolichos bean [Dolichos lablab L.]. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6: 381-395.

15. Pawar, R.M., Prajapati, R.M., Sawant, D.M. and Patil, A.H. 2013. Genetic divergence in Indian bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet). Electron. J. Plant Breed. 4: 1171-1174.

16. Rai, N., Asati, B.S. and Singh, A.K. 2009. Genetic divergence in Indian bean. Legume Res. 32: 166-172.

17. Singh, A., Pandey, A. K., Siddesh, S., Nale, R., Verma, N. and Kumar, V. 2024. Morphological characterization of elite Indian bean genotypes of Bundelkhand region. Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 10: 366-372.

18. Singh, A., Pandey, M., Pandey, A. K., Dubey, R. K., Sharma, G., Kumar, V. and Pandey, P. 2024. Variability in horticultural and biochemical traits of dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) landraces from Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh. Veg. Sci. 51: 142-147.

19. Singh, S., Prakash, A., Chakraborty, N. R., Wheeler, C., Agarwal, P. K. and Ghosh, A. 2016. Trait selection by path and principal component analysis in Jatropha curcas for enhanced oil yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 86: 173-179.

20. Sharifi, P., Astereki, H. and Pouresmael, M. 2018. Evaluation of variations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components by multivariate technique. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 16: 136–142.

21. Shibli, M. M., Rasul, M. G., Islam, A. K. M., Saikat, M. M. H. and Haque, M. M. 2021. Genetic diversity of country bean (Lablab purpureus) genotypes collected from the coastal regions of Bangladesh. J. Hortic. Postharvest Res. 4: 219-230.

22. Singh, S. R., Rajan, S., Kumar, D. and Soni, V. K. 2024. Genetic diversity assessment in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) based on principal component analysis and single linkage cluster analysis. Legume Res. 47: 120-130.

23. Verma, A. K., Jyothi, K.U., Singh, R. P. and Jhade, R. K. 2016. Genetic divergence studies in hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L.) genotypes. Environ. Ecol. 34: 437-440.

24. Vijayakumar, E., Thangaraj, K., Kalaimagal, T., Vanniarajan, C., Senthil, N. and Jeyakumar, P. 2020. Multivariate analysis of 102 Indian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) germplasm. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 11: 176–183.

25. Uyeda, J., Caetano, D. and Pennell, M. 2015. Comparative analysis of principal components can be misleading. Syst. Biol. 64: 677-689.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.