Effect of pruning time and intensity on growth, yield and fruit quality of phalsa (Grewia subinaequalis D.C.)

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.3.6

Keywords:

Growth, phalsa, Pruning intensity, quality attributes, yield.
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 83 No. 03 (2026): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Bhawna Singh, Bhanu Pratap, Om Prakash , Paramanand Prajapati, Manisha S. Tigga, Harsh Yadav

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Bhawna Singh Department of Horticulture, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Bhanu Pratap Department of Horticulture, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Om Prakash Department of Horticulture, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Paramanand Prajapati Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda
  • Manisha S. Tigga Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya
  • Harsh Yadav Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted at the Main Experimental Station, Department of Fruit Science,
Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P) during the year
2023-24. In this study, plants were pruned at six different intensities (5, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 55 cm above ground
level) on three different dates (27 January, 4 February, and 14 February), and each treatment combination was
replicated three times. The results revealed that minimum number of days taken to sprouting (19), highest
number of shoots per plant (70.34), number of nodes per shoot (19.02) and number of buds per node (9.25)
along with minimum days taken to flowering (51.5 days) and maximum yield per plant (2.76 kg) were recorded in
treatment D1T5 (27 Jan + 45cm). Quality attributes viz. maximum fruit length (0.93cm), fruit width (0.98cm), fruit
weight (84.29g), TSS (31.51 °B), reducing sugars (18.99%) and total sugars (23.67%) were found in treatment
D1T5 (27 Jan + 45cm) except for non-reducing sugars (4.78%) which was found highest in treatment D1T3 (27
Jan + 25cm) whereas lowest acidity (2.03 was observed in treatment D3T6 (14 Feb + 5cm). Further, it was found
that the treatment D1T5 (27 Jan + 45cm) proved to be the most effective treatment to improve the growth, yield
and fruit quality traits of phalsa.

How to Cite

Singh, B., Pratap, B., Prakash , O., Prajapati, P., Tigga, M. S., & Yadav, H. (2026). Effect of pruning time and intensity on growth, yield and fruit quality of phalsa (Grewia subinaequalis D.C.). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 83(03), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.3.6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Om Prakash , Department of Horticulture, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229, Uttar Pradesh, India

Dr. Om Prakash, Assistant Professor, Department of Fruit Science, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda.

References

REFERENCES

1. Abid, M., Muzamil, S., Kirmani, S. N., Khan, I. and Hassan, A. 2012. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and severity of pruning on growth, yield and quality of Phalsa (Grevia subinaequalis L.). Afr. J. of Agric. Res., 7(35): 4905-4910

2. Adhikari, S. and Kandel, T. P. 2015. Effect of time and level of pruning on vegetative growth, flowering, yield, and quality of guava. Int. J. fruit Sci., 15(3): 290-301

3. Ahmad, S., Chatha, Z. A., Nasir, M. A., Aziz, A., Virk, N. A. and Khan, A. R. 2006. Effect of pruning on the yield and quality of Kinnow fruit. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 2(1): 51-53.

4. Ahmed, S. and Ghafoor, A. 1962. Phalsa cultivation in West Pakistan. West Pak. Coop. Fruit Dev. Board Ltd. Lyallpur., 13: 4-6

5. Ali, F., Sahar, F. and Abdel-Hameed, A. A. 2014. Effect of pruning on yield and fruit quality of guava trees. J Agric Veterinary Sci., 7: 41-44.

6. Awasthi, A. M. and Mishra, R. 1969. Effect of pruning on subsequent vegetation growth, fruit set, fruit drop and quality in ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) cultivars. Punjab Hort. J., 9(1-2): 54-60

7. Bagchi, T. B., Sukul, P. and Ghosh, B. 2008. Biochemical changes during off-season flowering in guava (Psidium guajava L.) induced by bending and pruning. J Trop. Agric., 46: 64- 66.

8. Braswell, J. H. and Spiers, J. M. 2005. Effect of pruning on Climax Rabbit type blueberry (Vacciniumashei Reade), VII International symposium on Vaccinium culture. Acta Horticulturae, 574: 37-38.

9. George, A. P. and Nissen, N. C. 1987. Effect of cincturing, defoliation and summer pruning on growth and flowering of custard apple (Annonacherinola x Annonasquamosa) in subtropical Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 27(6): 915- 18.

10. Ghaffoor, A., Waseem, K. and Ali, H. S. 2001. Growth and yield response of phalsa/falsa (Grewia asiatica L.) to various pruning intensities and dates. Pakistan Journal of Forestry (Pakistan). 51(2).

11. Gola A. Q., Jakhro M. I., Tareen A. K., Mastoi M. S., Khosa M. A. 2018. Pure and Applied Biology, 7(4), 1261-1267.

12. Lakpathi, G., and Rajkumar, M. 2018. Effect of pruning intensities and fruit load on yield and quality of guava under high density planting system. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci, 7(5): 1853-1860

13. Pandey, R. C., Pathak, R. A. and Singh, I. S. 1998. Effect of pruning intensity on vegetative and reproductive growth in ber (Zizyphus mauritiana). Indian Journal of Horticulture, 55(4): 306-313

14. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication, 87-89.

15. Pilania, S., Shukla, A. K., Mahawer, L. N., Sharma, R. and Bairwa, H. L. 2010 Standardization of pruning intensity and integrated nutrient management in meadow orcharding of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80(8): 673– 678.

16. Rangaswami, G., Narsimhanna, M. N., Kashiviswanathan K., Sastry, C. R and Jolly M. S. 1976. Mulberry cultivation. Sericulture manual 1, FAO, Rome

17. Sah, H., Lal, S. and Negi, S. S. 2017. Effect of Pruning on Growth, Flowering and Yield in High Density Planting of Guava. International Journal Pure Applied Bioscience. 5(1): 285-292.

18. Saini, R. S., Panwar, R. D., Singh, S. and Kausik N. 2004. Effect of time and severity of pruning on growth, yield and quality of mulberry under rainfed condition. Progressive Horticulture, 36(1): 157-160

19. Singh, G. and Nautiyal, M. C. 2005. Response of pruning severity on fruit yield and physicochemical properties in apple cvs. Red Fuji and Scarlet Gala. PROGRESSIVE Horticulture, 37(1): 106

20. Singh, H., Bal, J. S. and Singh, G. 2004. Standardization of pruning technique in ber. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 61(3): 259-260

21. Singh, S., Krishnamurthi, S. and Katyal, S. L. 1967. Fruit culture in India, ICAR, New Delhi. pp. 207-14.

22. Suzuki, T. 1990. Apical control of lateral bud development and shoot growth in mulberry (Morus alba). Physiologia Plantarum, 80(3): 350-356.

23. Warang, O. S., Shah, N. I and Jadav, N. J. (2023). Optimizing phalsa (cv. Local) growth, flowering, and yield parameters through round-the-year pruning and fertilizer management. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 25(2): 117-1.

Similar Articles

<< < 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.