Assessment of genetic parameters in periwinkle through diallel analysis

Downloads

Published

2023-09-25

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.3.6

Keywords:

Periwinkle, genetic advance, coefficient of variation, heritability
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 80 No. 03 (2023): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Indian Journal of Horticulture

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Bolagam Ravikumar Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, Punjab, India.
  • K. K Dhatt Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, Punjab, India

Abstract

Estimation of genetic variability assists in determining the contribution of various plant parameters in
exhibiting the improvement of genotypes under a specific set of environmental factors. Genetic analysis allows us to clearly understand various morphological, physiological, and genetic traits, in addition to the type and extent of their role in the advancement of cultivars. The present investigation was carried out to evaluate six inbred lines of periwinkle (Vi-15-1, Vi-13-2, Vi-16, Vi-15-2, Vi-29, Vi-14-3), and their cross combinations in the full diallel fashion for ornamentally important characters. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant variations for all the parameters in all the inbred lines utilized in the study. The highest broad sense heritability estimates were observed for the number of seeds/follicles (H= 97.77 %) in the parents, whereas plant height had the highest heritability in the cross combinations (H= 98.73%). The high values of phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation in parents (PCV=34.41; GCV=34.02) and crosses (PCV=25.49; GCV=24.93) were recorded for the
number of seeds/follicles. In the present study, moderate to high heritability together with a high percentage of genetic advance was recorded for seeds/follicle, follicle length, primary branches/plant, plant height, internode length and plant spread, suggesting that the additive gene action controlled these characters. Therefore, the results suggested the existence of variability for studied traits in these periwinkle inbred lines, which should be improved in future breeding.

How to Cite

Ravikumar, B., & Dhatt, K. K. (2023). Assessment of genetic parameters in periwinkle through diallel analysis. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 80(03), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.3.6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barigidad, H., Patil, A.A. and Nalawadi, U.G. 1992. Variability studies in Chrysanthemum. Progressive Horti.24:55-59.

Behe, B.K. and Beckett, L.M. 1993. Season sales summary. Professional Plant Growers Assn. News. 24:2-19.

Bhattacharya, A. and Mandal, S. 2012. Pollination biology of ten medicinally important angiosperms of West Bengal (India). App. Bio. Res.14:86-94.

Burton, G.W. and DeVane, E.H. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinancea)from replicated clonal material. Agron. J. 45:478-481.

Byadwal, R.K., Mishra, A., Sharma, A.K. and Kavita. 2018. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in gaillardia (Gaillardia pulchella Foug.). IOSR J.Agric. Vet. Sci. 11:20-23.

Chen, R., Song, W., Li, Xl., Li, M., Liang, G. and Chen, C. 2003. Chromosome atlas of major economic plants genome in China. Beijing, China: Science Press.

Dovrat, A. and Goldschmidt, I. 1978. Cultivation aspects of Catharanthus roseus for roots. Acta Hort. 73:263-268.

Dwivedi, S., Singh, M., Singh, A.P., Sharma, S. and Kumar, S. 1999. Nature and degree of association among some important morphological traits in periwinble (Catharanthus roseus L.). J. M. A. P. S.21:338-342.

Howe, T.K. and Waters, W.E. 1994. Evaluation of Catharanthus (Vinca) cultivars for the landscape. Proc. Annu. Meet. Fla. State Hort. Soc.107:404-408.

Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comnock, R.E. 1955. Estimates of genetic andenvironmental variability in Soybeans. Agron. J. 47:314-318.

Kaur, R. and Dhatt, K.K. 2020. Estimation of genetic parameters for quantitative traits in pansy (Viola × wittrockiana). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 90:835-837.

Knuth, P. 1909. Handbook of flower pollination, Vol. III, (transl. by Davis JRA). Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Krishnan, R., Naragund, V.R. and Kumar, V.T. 1979. Evidences for outbreeding in Catharanthus roseus. Curr. Sci. 48:80-82.

Kulkarni, R.N., Dimri, B.P. and Rajgopal, K. 1984. Variability for quantitative character in periwinkle. Indian Drugs. 22:61-64.

Kulkarni, R.N. 1999. Evidence for phenotypic assortative mating for flower colour in periwinkle. Plant Breeding. 118:561-564.

Rai, T.S., Chaudhary, S.V.S., Dhiman, S.R., Dogra, R.K. and Gupta, R.K. 2017. Genetic variability, character association and path coefficient analysis in China aster (Callistephus chinensis). Indian J. Agric. Sci.87:540-543.

Ritu, B.M., Vonk, J. and Shackelford, T.K. (eds.) 2018. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Pp 52-71. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland AG.

Roller, U. 1978. Selection of plants and plant tissue cultures of Catharanthus roseus with high content of serpentine and ajmalicine. In: Alfermann, A.W. Reinhard, E. (Eds), Production of natural compounds by cell culture methods. Proc. Int. Symp. Plant Cell Culture. pp. 95-104.

Ross, I.A. 1999. Medicinal plants of the world: Chemical constituents, traditional and modern medicinal uses. New Jersey: Humana Press. (Original not seen. Cited by Kulkarni, R.N., Baskaran, K. and Jhang, T. 2016. Characterization and utilization. Plant gen. res.14:283-302).

Roychowdhury, R. and Tah, J. 2011. Genetic variability study for yield and associated quantitative characters in mutant genotypes of Dianthus caryophyllus L. Int. J. Biosci.1:38-44.

Singh, M. and Dhatt, K.K. 2021. Assessment of combining ability for morphological traits in periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don) genotypes using diallel analysis.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.97:265-271.

Singh, M. and Dwivedi, S. 2010. Genetic analysis of morpho-economic traits in periwinkle. Indian Foreste. 136:1034-1050.

Sreevalli, Y., Baskaran, K., Kulkarni, R.N. and Kumar, S. 2000. Further evidence for the absence of automatic and intra-flower self-pollination in periwinkle. Curr.Sci. 79:1648-1649.

Stearn, W.T. 1975. A synopsis of the genus Catharanthus (Apocynaceae). In: Taylor, R.W. and Farnsworth, N.R. (eds) The Catharanthus Alkaloids. Botany, Chemistry,Pharmacology and Clinical Use. Pp. 9-44. Marcel Dekker, New York. (Original not seen. Cited by Kulkarni, R.N., Baskaran, K. and Jhang, T. 2016. Characterization and utilization. Plant gen. res.14:283-302).

Talha, M., Radwan, A.S. and Negm, S. 1975. The effect of soil moisture deficit on growth and alkaloid content of Catharanthus roseus G. DON. Curr. Sci.44:614-616.

Tamut, O., Kulkarni, B.S. and Patil, S.R. 2015. Genetic variability in gaillardia (Gaillardia pulchella). Indian J. Agric. Sci.85:684-687.

Van, B.M.A. 1996. Revision of Catharanthus G. Don series of revisions of Apocynaceae XLI. Wageningen. Agric.Uni. Papers. 96:9-45.

Vishnupriy, A.K., Jawaharlal, M. and Manivannan, N. 2015. Variability studies in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). The Bioscan. 10:407-409.

Yuvraj, S. and Dhatt, K.K. 2014. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in marigold. Indian J. Hortic. 71:592-594.

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.