Tractor-operated hydraulically controlled tree shaker for harvesting fruits

Published

2023-09-25

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.3.10

Keywords:

Mechanical fruit harvester, Phyllanthus emblica, Syzygium cumini L., Vibratory trunk shaker
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Apoorv Prakash Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • A. K Dixit Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • Rohinish Khurana Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • Manjeet Singh Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • A. K Mahal Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
  • G. S Manes Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

Abstract

A tractor-operated hydraulically controlled tree shaker was developed to harvest Aonla (Phyllanthus
emblica) and Jamun (Syzygium cumini) fruits. This machine generates vibration to shake fruit trees with
provision to hold the tree trunk up to 2438 mm high. Besides, a collecting basket made of green net with fully opened diameter of 6706 mm has also been developed. Performance assessment of the machine was carried out on Aonla and Jamun fruit trees at two different stroke rates and compared with the traditional method of fruit harvesting. The best results were obtained at stroke rates 1480 ± 8 and 1600 ± 12 rpm for Aonla and Jamun trees, respectively. The average harvest per tree at these stroke rates was 52.99 kg and 12.53 kg for Aonla and Jamun trees, respectively. Mature, immature, and damaged harvested fruits were 78.59%, 5.59% and 15.81%, respectively, for Aonla. In Jamun, the mature, immature, and damaged harvests were 82.34%, 7.10%, and 10.56%, respectively. The overall fuel consumption for harvesting Aonla and Jamun fruits was 5.6 and 6.06 l/h, respectively. For Aonla, the cost of harvesting with the machine was Rs. 5.03/kg, whereas it was Rs. 20.94/kg for jamun. In contrast, the cost of harvesting in the traditional method was Rs. 4.20/kg for Aonla and Rs. 15/kg for Jamun. The cost of operation was higher due to the harvesting of untrained, non-pruned trees and the machine being a functional prototype. The overall saving in labour was 74-80% in Aonla and 75-80% in Jamun fruit harvesting compared to the manual method.

How to Cite

Prakash, A., Dixit, A. K., Khurana, R., Singh, M., Mahal, A. K., & Manes, G. S. (2023). Tractor-operated hydraulically controlled tree shaker for harvesting fruits. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 80(03), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.3.10

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

A. K Mahal, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

 

 

References

Wang, Z. H., Xun, Y., Wang, Y. K. and Yang, Q. H. 2022. Review of smart robots for fruit and vegetable picking in agriculture. Int J Agric Bio Eng 15: 33-54.

Anonymous, 2018. Horticultural statistics at a glance, 2018. Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.

Anonymous, 2015. Diversification plan for Punjab. http://punenvis.nic.in, Site visited on April 2023.

He, L., Liu, X., Du, X., and Wu, C. 2020. In-situ identification of shaking frequency for adaptive vibratory fruit harvesting. Comp Elec Agric 170: 105-245.

Zhang, Z., Igathinathane, C., Li, J., Cen, H., Lu, Y and Flores, P. 2020. Technology progress in mechanical harvest of fresh market apples. Comp Elec Agric 175: 105-606.

Sanders, K. F. 2005. Orange harvesting systems review. Biosyst Eng 90: 115–125

Sumner, H. R. 1973. Selective harvesting of Valencia oranges with a vertical canopy shaker. Trans ASAE 16: 1024-1026.

Whitney, J. D., Churchill, D. B., Hedden, S. L. and Smerage, G. H. 1988. Trunk shakers for citrus harvesting—Part I: Measured trunk shaker and tree trunk motion. Appl Eng Agric 4: 93–101.

Sarkar, P. 2021. Use of shaking mechanism and robotic arm in fruit harvesting: A comprehensive review. J Crop Weed 17: 1-9.

Torregrosa, A., Orti, E., Martin, B., Gil, J. and Ortiz, C. 2009. Mechanical harvesting of oranges and mandarins in Spain. Biosyst Eng 104: 18–24.

Kleine, M. E. D. and Karkee, M. 2015. A semi-automated harvesting prototype for shaking fruit tree limbs. Trans ASABE 58:1461–1470.

Caprara, C, and Pezzi, F. 2011. Measuring the stresses transmitted during mechanical grape harvesting. Biosyst Eng 110: 97-105.

Robb, S. and Ravetti, L. 2010. Continuous mechanical harvesting in modern Australian olive growing systems. Adv Hort Sci 24:7 1–77

Chen, D., Du, X., Zhang, Q., Whiting, M., Scharf, P. and Wang, S. 2012. Performance evaluation of mechanical cherry harvesters for fresh market grade fruits. Appl Eng Agric 28: 483-489.

Ferreira, L. D., da Silva, F. M., Ferreira, D. D. and Sales, R. S. 2016. Recommendation for mechanical harvesting of coffee based on vibration behaviour settings rods harvesters. Cienc Rural 46: 273-278.

Yu, P. C., Li, C. Y., Takeda, F., Krewer, G., Rains, G. and Hamrita, T. 2014. Measurement of mechanical impacts created by rotary, slapper, and sway blueberry mechanical harvesters. Comp Elec Agric 101: 84-92.

Coppock, G. E. 1961. Picking citrus fruit by mechanical means. Proceeding 74th Florida State Horticulture Society. pp 247-251.

Li, P., Lee, H. S., and Hsu, Y. H.. 2011. Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems. Proceeding in Eng 23: 351-366.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.