Utilization of the most recent GGE biplot to locate stable genotypes in turmeric using the well-liked Eberheart Russell stability model

Stability Analysis of Turmeric in Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Chhattisgarh

Published

2026-03-31

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.1.3

Keywords:

Indigenous turmeric, AMMI and GGE biplots, genotype × environment interaction, rhizome yield
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Shrikant L. Sawargaonkar 1ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India
  • A.K. Singh ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India
  • M.K. Sahu ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, Gujarat 388001, India
  • S. Agrawal College Agriculture and Research Station, Raigarh
  • B. Patel College Agriculture and Research Station, Raigarh

Abstract

GGE and AMMI biplot methods with Eberhart and Russell regression model were applied on the set of twelve indigenous turmeric genotypes grown in nine environments for quick and relevant method to delineate genotype by environment interaction, stable genotypes and environmental discrimination. The average rhizome yield over the locations was depicted as 12.01 ton/ha, which ranged from 7.87 ton/ha (Jagdalpur) to 20.02 ton/ha (Raigarh). The genotype CG Haldi 2 (16.61 ton/ha) exhibited the highest rhizome yield followed by IT 36 (15.00 ton/ha), over national checks Roma (13.53 ton/ha), Suranjana (11.73 ton/ha) and over local check CG Haldi -1 (10.57 ton/ha). As per Eberhart and Russell model, the genotypes CG Haldi 2 (IT 10), CG Raigarh Haldi-3 (IT 36), Roma, and Narendra Haldi -1 were best performing entries while the performance of BSR 2, IT 38, Suranjana, CG Haldi-1, IT 7, and IT 8 were varied with change in environments. In AMMI analysis, IPCA 1 (62.60 %), IPCA 2 (21.80 %), IPCA 3 (11.70 %), and IPCA 4 (2.60 %) were explained the interaction mean squares, respectively. While, in GGE biplot, PC 1 and PC 2 captured 47.28 % and 34.62 % interaction variation, respectively. The genotypes T-111 (CG Haldi-2), T-101 (IT 36), and national check T-106 (Roma) were high yielding and as well as found stable in GGE and AMMI-1 biplot. The test environments RG 17, RG 16 and RG 15 exhibited different niches, whereas, AM 17, AM 16, JD 16, JD 17, JD 15 and AM 15 were representative with better discriminating ability. Between biplot models applied, the GGE biplots were clear in visualization for polygon view, genotypic stability and environmental discrimination. The GGE method considered both G+GE for biplot generation and found most suitable for stability analysis.

How to Cite

L. Sawargaonkar, S., A.K. Singh, M.K. Sahu, S. Agrawal, & B. Patel. (2026). Utilization of the most recent GGE biplot to locate stable genotypes in turmeric using the well-liked Eberheart Russell stability model: Stability Analysis of Turmeric in Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Chhattisgarh. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 83(01), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.1.3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anandaraj, M., Prasatha, D., Kandiannana, K., John T. Z., Srinivasana, V., Jha, A.K., Singh, B.K., Singh, A.K., Pandey, V.P., Singh, S.P., Shoba, N., Jana, J.C., Ravindra K. and Maheswari U. 2014. Genotype by environment interaction effects on yield and curcumin in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. Crop Prod. 53:358-364.

2. Dehghani, H., Ebadi, A. and Yousefi, A. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agron. J. 98:388-393.

3. Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.

4. Flores, F., Moreno, M.T. and Cubero, J.I. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyse G×E interaction. Field Crops Res. 56:271-286.

5. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:488- 500.

6. Gauch, H.G., Piepho, H.P. and Annicchiarico, P. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866-889.

7. Kang, M.S., Ma B., Woods, S. and Cornelius, P.L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643-653.

8. Muthusamy, A. 2013. A study on export on performance on Indian Turmeric. Ind. J. Appl. Res. 3:54

9. Rad, M.R.N., Kadir, M.A., Rafii, M.Y., Jaafar, H.Z., Naghavi, M.R. and Ahmadi, F. 2013. Genotype× environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 7:956–61.

10. Srikrishnah, S. and Sutharsan, S. 2015. Effect of different shade levels on growth and tuber yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in the Batticaloa district of Sri Lanka. Amer. J. Agril. Env. Sci. 15: 813-816.

11. Suresh, D., Manjunatha H. and Srinivasan, K. 2008. Effect of heat processing of spices on the concentrations of their bioactive principles: turmeric (Curcuma longa), red pepper (Capsicum annuum) and black pepper (Piper nigrum). J Food Compos Anal. 20:346- 351.

12. Weiss, E.A. 2002. Spice crops. CABI Publishing, Wallingfoard. 43.

13. Yan, W. and Tinker, N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Cand. J. Plant Sci. 86:623-645.

14. Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q. and Sulavnics, Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605.

15. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S. and Cornelius, P. L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci., 47(2):643–653.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.