Ascertaining wedge grafting time of wild mango seedling under subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Downloads

Published

2025-10-03

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.15

Keywords:

wedge grafting, root stock, graft success, survival percentage, subtropical
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 82 No. 03 (2025): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 SHIV KUMAR SHIVANDU, Sanjeev Banyal, Uday Patial, Nischala Arya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Shiv Kumar Shivandu Dr. yashwant singh parmar university of horticulture and forestry nauni solan
  • Sanjeev Banyal Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni Solan HP
  • Uday Patial PAU Ludhiana
  • Nischala Arya Collage of Horticulture and Forestry Neri, Dr YSPUHF Nauni Solan (HP)

Abstract

This study was conducted at the College of Horticulture and Forestry in Neri, Himachal Pradesh, addresses the challenge of meeting the high demand of premium planting material. Focusing on wedge grafting, the research aimed to standardize grafting time under sub-tropical conditions. Randomized block design with seven treatments, T1 (First fortnight of August) emerged as the best time, exhibiting the shortest bud break duration (16.43 days), highest graft success rate (68.19%), and maximum graft survival (72.00%). T1 also resulted in maximum height (32.11 cm), number of leaves (15.02), branches (1.80), and scion diameter (7.60 mm). While T2 (Second fortnight of August) showed maximum rootstock diameter, T3 (Second fortnight of September). In conclusion, August, particularly the first fortnight (T1), was identified as the key month for achieving optimal wedge grafting outcomes in Himachal Pradesh, addressing the demand for high-quality planting material in the region.

How to Cite

Shiv Kumar Shivandu, Banyal, S., Patial, U., & Arya, N. (2025). Ascertaining wedge grafting time of wild mango seedling under subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 82(03). https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.15

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sanjeev Banyal, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni Solan HP

Associate Professor, at dept of fruit science CoH Neri, Dr YSPUHF

References

1. Goldschmidt, E. E. 2013. The evolution of fruit tree productivity: a review. Economic Botany, 67: 51-62.

2. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons.

3. Honja, T. (2014). Review of mango value chain in Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc., 4: 230-239.

4. Jagannath Mandal, J. M., Mandal, B. K., Singh, R. R. and Jaiswal, U. S. 2012. Effect of grafting height and cultivars on the performance of soft wood grafting in mango. 1: 171-174.

5. Janick, J. 2012. Fruit breeding: past, present and future. In XXII Congresso Brasilerio de. Fruiticultura, Bento Goncalves-RS, 22a 26: 1-22.

6. Karna, A. K., Varu, D. K., Panda, P. A. and Hota, D. 2017. Standardization of grafting time and height on success of softwood grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem, 6: 2803-7.

7. Karna, A. K., Varu, D. K., Patel, M. K. and Panda, P. A. 2018. Effect of grafting time on success of softwood grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 7: 3072-77.

8. Kelaskar, A. J., Desai, A. G. and Salvi, M. J. 1993. Effect of season on the success and growth of bud grafts of jack (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) 31: 112-115.

9. Kumar, Y. H. S., Swamy, G. S. K., Patil, C. P., Kanamadi, V. C. and Kumar, P. 2007. Effect of pre-soaking treatments on germination, growth, vigour index and vigour of rootstocks in mango. J. Asian Hortic. 3: 157-161.

10. Mandal, J., Gupta, R. K., Kumar, M. and Mishra, P. K. Influence of cultivars and defoliations of scion shoots on success of veneer grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Prog. Res. Int. J. 10

11. Mukherjee, S. K. and Litz, R. E. 2009. Introduction: botany and importance. In The mango: Botany, production and uses (1-18). Wallingford UK: CABI.

12. Nakasone, H. Y. and Paull, R.E. 1998. Mangosteen. In: Nakasone, H.Y. and Paull, R.E. (eds.). Tropical Fruit. CAB International, pp. 359- 369.

13. Nalage, N. A., Magar, S. D., Bhosale, S. S. and Mhetre, D. A. 2010. Effect of height of rootstock on success of epicotyl grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. KESAR. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 6: 124-128.

14. NHB. 2022. Horticultural statistics at a glance 2021. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. 56–58.

15. Palande, A. L., Karale, A. R., Shirsath, H. K. and Garad, B. V. 2004. Effect of seasons and genotypes on success and growth of bud grafts in tamarind. South Indian J. Hort. 52: 252-255.

16. Patel, B. M. and Amin, R. S. 1981. Investigation into the best period for soft wood grafting of mango in situ. South Indian J. Hort. 29: 90-93.

17. Pathak, R. S. and Pandey, G. 2006. Calderón’s reproducing formula for Hankel convolution. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 24217-1.

18. Pereira, M. C. T., Viana, R. C., Correa, H. C. T. and Nietsche, S. 2002. Evaluation of grafting methods in mango trees. In VII International Mango Symposium 645 (679-683).

19. Singh, R. N., Rao, O. P. and Gorakh Singh, G. S. 1984. Propagational studies in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Langra. Prog. Hort. 16: 161-165.

Similar Articles

<< < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.