Pruning intensity, bio-enhancers and biofertilizer induced effect on yield, physico-chemical traits of mango cv. Dashehari-51

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.14

Keywords:

Pruning intensities, bio-enhancers, biofertilizer, specific gravity, yield
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 82 No. 03 (2025): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Saurabh tiwari, V.K. Tripathi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Saurabh tiwari Department of Fruit Science, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur 208 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • V.K. Tripathi Department of Fruit Science, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur 208 002, Uttar Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3829-4315

Abstract

An experiment was conducted with varying intensities of pruning, bio-enhancers, and biofertilizers. Significant improvements were observed across all yield, physical, and chemical traits in the integrated treatments, when data were pooled for both years, T9-Retention of 20 cm + 30% Fruit Thinning + Panchgavya (3%) + Azotobacter (100 g/tree) consistently outperforming then others. In yield traits, T9 produced the highest number of fruits per panicle (5.37), number of fruits per tree (210.33) and fruit yield (5.12 tons/ha), whereas in physical and chemical traits T9 also resulted an increased fruit length (11.78 cm), fruit width (7.18 cm), fruit weight (244.18 g), fruit volume (237.87 cc), specific gravity (1.027 g/cm3), pulp weight (193.59 g), peel weight (19.51 g), stone weight (31.09 g), stone length (5.95 cm), stone width (3.06cm), stone thickness (1.40 cm), kernel length (3.28 cm), kernel width (1.76 cm), kernel thickness (1.06 cm), pulp: peel ratio (9.97), pulp: stone ratio (6.23), total soluble solids (20.20 ºBrix), total sugars (21.08%), titratable acidity (0.398%), sugar: acid ratio (53.03) and TSS: acid ratio (50.81).

How to Cite

Saurabh tiwari, & Tripathi, V. (2025). Pruning intensity, bio-enhancers and biofertilizer induced effect on yield, physico-chemical traits of mango cv. Dashehari-51. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 82(03), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. AOAC 2012. Official Method of Analysis: Association of Analytical Chemists. 19th Edition, Washington DC, pp. 121-130.

2. Bhadauria, A. S. and Tripathi, V. K. 2023. Effect of bio-enhancers and biofertilizers on growth and quality of mango cv. Amrapali under sub-tropical plains of Central Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 35 (19): 1260–1267. doi.org/10.9734/ IJPSS/2023/V35I193665

3. Bhadauria, A. S. and Tripathi, V. K. 2023. Fruit characteristics and yield of mango cv. Amrapali as influenced by bio-enhancers and bio-fertilizers. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change. 13 (10): 1973-1981. doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2023/ V13I102855

4. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. 2022. Horticultural statistics at a glance: 2023- 24 (Final). Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

5. Devi, S., Yadav, R. K. and Singh, A. 2023. Effect of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of papaya (Carica papaya L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 12(1): 815-820. doi. org/10.5555/20230218636

6. Fisher, R. A. 1947. Statistical methods for research workers (11th ed.). Oliver and Boyd.

7. Lauricella, M., Emanuele, S., Calvaruso, G., Giuliano, M. and D’Anneo, A. 2017. Multifaceted health benefits of Mangifera indica L. (mango): The inestimable value of an orchard tree. Nutrients. 9(5): 525.

8. Rathod, H. P., Chavan, M. R. and Deshmukh, S. S. 2022. Effect of biofertilizers and bioinoculants on yield and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Pharma Innov. J. 11(3): 650–654.

9. Rawat, S. S., Singh, A. K., Yadav, P. K. and Meena, R. K. 2020. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, flowering, fruiting and yield of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 9(3): 1234- 1238.

10. Sauco, V.G. 1996. Horticultural practices of mango. Acta Hort. 455: 391-400.

11. Sharma, R., Jain, P. K. and Sharma, T. R. 2016. Effect of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients on physico-chemical composition of mango (Mangifera indica L) cv. Amrapali. Economic Affairs. 61(4): 677.

12. Sharma, R., Kumar, A. and Thakur, N. 2022. Effect of pruning time and intensity on growth, yield and quality of kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco) under north western Shivalik region of India. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 11(1): 1716- 1721.

13. Shukla, J. K., Tripathi, V. K. and Trivedi, A. K. 2025. Effect of organic manure and bio-fertilizers on the quality enhancement of dragon fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis) (Web.) Britton and Rose. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 31(3): 346–353. doi. org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i32907

14. Singh, A. K., Singh, C. P. and Bora, Lokesh. 2017. Impact of pruning on growth, yield and quality of mango cv. Dashehari. J. Hortic. Sci. 12(2): 118- 123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v12i2.11

15. Singh, S. K., Sharma, R. and Srivastav, M. 2010. Effect of pruning on morpho-physiological parameters and microclimate under high-density planting of mango (Mangifera indica). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 79(8): 632-635.

16. Singh, S. K., Yadav, R. K. and Kumar, R. 2022. Effect of pruning intensities on physical quality parameters of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 10(1): 120-123.

17. Singh, T. K., Singh, D., Jain, A. K. and Bose, U. S. 2018. Effect of pruning with paclobutrazol application on growth, yield and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(8): 883-888. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.100

Similar Articles

<< < 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.