Morpho-physiological adaptations in grafted tomato plant under concomitant infestation of Fusarium oxysporum and Meloidogyne incognita

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.3

Keywords:

Scion, rootstock, trusses, grafting, nematode, fruit quality
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 82 No. 03 (2025): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Kalpana Yadav, Indu Arora, Anil Kumar, Surender Kumar Dhankhar, Davinder Singh, Shubham Saini, Kapil, Pooja Pahal, Asmit Saini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Kalpana Yadav Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Indu Arora Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Anil Kumar Department of Nematology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Surender Kumar Dhankhar Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Davinder Singh Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Shubham Saini Department of Plant Pathology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Kapil Department of Entomology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Pooja Pahal Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Asmit Saini Department of Vegetable Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of rootstocks, scions, and their interactions on tomato growth, physiology, yield, fruit quality, and disease resistance under Fusarium-nematode infested conditions. At early stages, nongrafted scions (R0) showed higher plant height (up to 28.56 cm at 60 DAT), but at final harvest, grafted plants with RB5 rootstock reached the greatest height (146.25 cm) compared to RB3 (144.79 cm) and R0 (142.42 cm). RB5 also significantly increased leaf area (33.70 sq. cm with polyhouse LC scion) and leaf relative water content (71.25%), outperforming RB3 and non-grafted plants. Carotenoid content peaked at 1.35 mg/g in RB5 × Pusa Ruby, and chlorophyll content reached 2.95 mg/g in RB5 × Polyhouse LC. Yield attributes were highest with RB5: 6.76 trusses per plant, 45.73 fruits per plant, average fruit weight of 50.67 g, and total fruit yield of 257.66 q/ha, surpassing RB3 and R0. Fruit quality improved with RB5, showing highest total soluble solids (5.80 °Brix) and ascorbic acid (20.25 mg/100g), while acidity remained stable (~0.31%). Disease parameters revealed RB5 strong resistance, with the lowest root galls (12.50), egg masses (7.17), soil nematode population (41.85/200 cc), and fusarium wilt incidence (27.50%), compared to high susceptibility in R0 (galls 124.42, egg masses 104.25, nematodes 284.55, wilt 91.67%). Scion effects were less marked and interactions mostly nonsignificant, indicating rootstock RB5 as the key factor for enhanced growth, yield, quality, and disease tolerance in nematode-infested conditions.

How to Cite

Yadav, K., Arora, I., Kumar, A., Dhankhar, S. K., Singh, D., Saini, S., … Saini, A. (2025). Morpho-physiological adaptations in grafted tomato plant under concomitant infestation of Fusarium oxysporum and Meloidogyne incognita. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 82(03), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.3.3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baidya, S., Timila, R.D., KC, R.B., Manandhar, H.K. and Manandhar, C. 2017. Management of root-knot nematode on tomato through grafting rootstock of Solanum sisymbriifolium. J. Nepal Agric. Res. Council 3: 27-31.

2. Bikdeloo, M., Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Hassandokht, M.R., Soltani, F., Salehi, R., Kumar, P. and Cardarelli, M. 2021. Morphological and physio-biochemical responses of watermelon grafted onto rootstocks of wild watermelon [Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad] and commercial interspecific cucurbita hybrid to drought stress. Horticulturae 7(10): 359.

3. Caradonia, F., Francia, E., Alfano, V. and Ronga, D. 2023. Grafting and plant density influence tomato production in organic farming system. Horticulturae 9(6): 669.

4. Friedman, M. 2002. Tomato glycoalkaloids: role in the plant and in the diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(21): 5751-5780.

5. Ghazalibiglar, H. 2016. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by Trichoderma isolates. New Zealand Plant Protect. 69: 57-63.

6. Hossain, M., Ali, M., Ripa, R.A., Ayrin, S. and Mahmood, S. 2019. Influence of rootstocks on yield and quality of summer tomato cv. ‘Bari Tomato-4’. Earth Syst. Environ. 3(2): 289-300.

7. Ibrahim, A., Wahb-Allah, M., Abdel-Razzak, H. and Alsadon, A. 2014. Growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of grafted tomato plants grown in greenhouse under different irrigation levels. Life Sci. J. 11(2): 118-126.

8. Indiastat. 2022. Available online: https://www.indiastat.com/table/agriculture/selected-state-wise-area-production-productivity-t/1442091 (accessed on Jan 1, 2024).

9. Jabnoun-Khiareddine, H., Abdallah, R.A.B., Nefzi, A., Ayed, F. and Daami-Remadi, M. 2019. Grafting tomato cultivars for soilborne disease suppression and plant growth and yield improvement. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 10(1): 473.

10. King, S.R., Davis, A.R., Zhang, X. and Crosby, K. 2010. Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Scientia Hortic. 127(2): 106-111.

11. Marsic, K.N. and Osvald, J. 2004. The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta Agric. Slovenica 83(2): 243-249.

12. Pogonyi, A., Pék, Z., Helyes, L. and Lugasi, A. 2005. Effect of grafting on the tomato's yield, quality and main fruit components in spring forcing. Acta Alimentaria 34(4): 453-462.

13. Rahmatian, A., Delshad, M. and Salehi, R. 2014. Effect of grafting on growth, yield and fruit quality of single and double stemmed tomato plants grown hydroponically. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 55: 115-119.

14. Rashid, M.A., Rahman, A., Ahmed, B., Luther, G.C. and Black, L. 2004. Demonstration and pilot production of grafted eggplant and grafted tomato and training of farmers. http://www.avrdc.org

15. Sharma, V., Kumar, P., Sharma, P., Sharma, P.K., Negi, N.D. and Sharma, A. 2019. Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) amelioration in tomato under protected conditions through rootstocks. J. Entomol. Zool. Studies 7(3): 1518-1523.

16. Singh, S. 2020. Imparting root-knot nematode resistance through grafting in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). PhD thesis, PAU, Ludhiana, Punjab.

17. Yetışır, H., Sari, N. and Yücel, S. 2003. Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica 31(2): 163-169.

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)