Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based intercropping systems under humid tropical conditions of Kerala, India

Published

2026-06-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.13

Keywords:

carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, plantation cropping systems, coconut-based intercropping
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Sriyansu Nayak Department of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Agriculture Vellanikara, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India
  • P. Lincy Davis Department of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Agriculture Vellanikara, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India
  • B. Ajithkumar Department of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India,
  • Beena V. I. Department of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India
  • Sajitha Vijayan M. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur 680656, Kerala, India

Abstract

In Kerala, India’s humid tropics, coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) plantations dominate the land-use system;
however, monocropping techniques frequently lead to inefficient use of biomass resources and land.
Introducing perennial plantation crops within the coconut plantation led to enhance the carbon storage and farm
sustainability. This study quantified and compared carbon sequestration potential in coconut monoculture and
coconut-based intercropping systems with cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) under
humid tropical conditions in Kerala, India. The experiment was conducted at Kerala Agricultural University,
Vellanikkara, from September 2024 to September 2025, with five treatments: coconut monocrop (WCT), hybrid
monocrop (Dwarf × Tall), coconut-cocoa, coconut-nutmeg and a non-cropped control. Above ground biomass
was estimated using species-specific allometric equations, while soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured at
0-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm depths. Total carbon stock, obtained by combining above ground and soil carbon,
varied significantly among systems. The coconut-cocoa system recorded the highest total carbon stock (156.79
t ha-1), followed by coconut-nutmeg (110.95 t ha-1), coconut monoculture (82.89 t ha-1) and hybrid monoculture
(72.48 t ha-1), while in non-cropped control recorded only 13.91 t ha-1. SOC declined with depth, with maximum
values in the 0-15 cm layer. Intercropped systems also showed lower bulk density than the non-cropped control,
indicating improved soil physical condition. The results underscore coconut-based intercropping, particularly
with cocoa, as an effective plantation management strategy for enhancing carbon sequestration and promoting
climate-resilient, sustainable coconut production.

How to Cite

Nayak, S., Davis, P. L., Ajithkumar, B., V. I., B., & Vijayan M., S. (2026). Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based intercropping systems under humid tropical conditions of Kerala, India. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 83(02), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.13

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhagya, H.P., Maheswarappa, H.P., Surekha, P. and Bhat, R. (2017). Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based cropping systems. Indian J. Hort. 74(1): 1-5.

Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., and Zanne, A. E. 2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12(4): 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x

Davis, S.J., Caldeira, K. and Matthews, H.D. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Sci. 329(3): 1330-1333.

Ghavale, S.L., Shinde, V.V., Wankhede, S.M., Maheswarappa, H.P. and Haldankar, P.M., 2020. Carbon sequestration and productivity potential of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) hybrids and varieties under coastal eco-system of Maharashtra. Current J. Appl. Sci. Techn. 39(22), pp.30-37.

Ketterings, Q. M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau, Y., and Palm, C. A. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 146(1-3): 199-209.

Maheswarappa, H.P., Palaniswami, C., Dhanapal, R. and Subramanian, P. (2010). Coconut based intercropping and mixed cropping systems. J. Plant. Crops. 37(4): 14-16.

Manzeke-Kangara, M. G., Nyamadzawo, G., Nyagumbo, I., and Nyamugafata, P. 2025. Soil organic carbon and related properties under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Front. Soil Sci. 4: 1481275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2024.1481275

Montagnini, F. and Nair, P.K.R. (2004). Carbon sequestration: An under exploited environmental benefits of agro forestry system. Agrofor. Syst. 61(5): 281-288.

Nair, S. and Subba Rao N. 1997. Microbiology of the root region of coconut and cacao under mixed cropping. Plant and Soil 46: 511-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015910

Namitha, V. V., Raj, S. K., Jacob, D., Pillai, P. S., Radhakrishnan, N. V., Paramesha, V., and Nath, A. J. 2025. Impact of crop combination and nutrient management on productivity, profitability, and soil health in a coconut-based multistoried cropping system in Kerala, India. Front. sustain. food syst. 9: 1605962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1605962

Naresh, K.S., Kasthuri, B.K.V., and George, J. 2008. A method for non-destructive estimation of dry weight of coconut stem. J. Plant. Crops 36: 296-99.

Naveen Kumar, K.S. and Maheswarappa, H.P. 2019. Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based cropping systems under integrated nutrient management practices. J. Plant. Crops 47(2): 107-114. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2019.v47.i2.5776

Nuwarapaksha, N., Silva, R., and Perera, A. 2024. Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based agroforestry systems in Sri Lanka: Spatial and temporal variations. Carbon For. 3(1): 31- 45. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/cf.2024.31

Ozturkmen, A. R., Ramazanoglu, E., Almaca, A., and Çakmakli, M. 2020. Effect of intercropping on soil physical and chemical properties in an olive orchard. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 18(6).

Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. (2005). Source book for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Ecol. Appl. 57(2): 45-48.

Raveendra, S.A.S.T., Atapattu, A.A.A.J., Senarathne, S.H.S., Ranasinghe, C.S., and Weerasinghe, K.W.L.K. 2017. Evaluation of the carbon sequestration potential of intercropping systems under coconut in Sri Lanka. J.G.E.E. 7(1): 1-7. http://www.cibtech.org/jgee.htm

Ranasinghe, C.S. and Silva, L.R.S. (2007). Photosynthetic assimilation, carbohydrates in vegetative organs and carbon removal in nut-producing and sap-producing coconut palms. Cocos. 8(6): 45-57.

Shinde, S.S. and Nandgude, S.B. 2024. Soil organic carbon stocks assessment under different land use land cover in Morna Watershed, India using GIS technique. M.J.A.S. 58(3): 342-353.

Srinivasan, V., Maheswarappa, H. P., and Lal, R. 2012. Long-term effects of topsoil depth and amendments on particulate and non-particulate carbon fractions in a Miamian soil of Central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 121: 10-17.

Tesfahunegn, G. B. and Gebru, T. A. 2020. Variation in soil properties under different cropping and other land-use systems in Dura catchment, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0222476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222476

Walkey, A. and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Digestion method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38.

Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., and Lewis, S. L. 2009. Global wood density database. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.in/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=4kA8Vvz2HqLR8Ae7urKABQ#q=global+wood+density+database+zanne

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.