Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based intercropping systems under humid tropical conditions of Kerala, India
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.13Keywords:
carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, plantation cropping systems, coconut-based intercroppingIssue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sriyansu Nayak, P. Lincy Davis, B. Ajithkumar, Beena V. I., Sajitha Vijayan M.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In Kerala, India’s humid tropics, coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) plantations dominate the land-use system;Abstract
however, monocropping techniques frequently lead to inefficient use of biomass resources and land.
Introducing perennial plantation crops within the coconut plantation led to enhance the carbon storage and farm
sustainability. This study quantified and compared carbon sequestration potential in coconut monoculture and
coconut-based intercropping systems with cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) under
humid tropical conditions in Kerala, India. The experiment was conducted at Kerala Agricultural University,
Vellanikkara, from September 2024 to September 2025, with five treatments: coconut monocrop (WCT), hybrid
monocrop (Dwarf × Tall), coconut-cocoa, coconut-nutmeg and a non-cropped control. Above ground biomass
was estimated using species-specific allometric equations, while soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured at
0-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm depths. Total carbon stock, obtained by combining above ground and soil carbon,
varied significantly among systems. The coconut-cocoa system recorded the highest total carbon stock (156.79
t ha-1), followed by coconut-nutmeg (110.95 t ha-1), coconut monoculture (82.89 t ha-1) and hybrid monoculture
(72.48 t ha-1), while in non-cropped control recorded only 13.91 t ha-1. SOC declined with depth, with maximum
values in the 0-15 cm layer. Intercropped systems also showed lower bulk density than the non-cropped control,
indicating improved soil physical condition. The results underscore coconut-based intercropping, particularly
with cocoa, as an effective plantation management strategy for enhancing carbon sequestration and promoting
climate-resilient, sustainable coconut production.
How to Cite
Downloads
Bhagya, H.P., Maheswarappa, H.P., Surekha, P. and Bhat, R. (2017). Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based cropping systems. Indian J. Hort. 74(1): 1-5. Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., and Zanne, A. E. 2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12(4): 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x Davis, S.J., Caldeira, K. and Matthews, H.D. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Sci. 329(3): 1330-1333. Ghavale, S.L., Shinde, V.V., Wankhede, S.M., Maheswarappa, H.P. and Haldankar, P.M., 2020. Carbon sequestration and productivity potential of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) hybrids and varieties under coastal eco-system of Maharashtra. Current J. Appl. Sci. Techn. 39(22), pp.30-37. Ketterings, Q. M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau, Y., and Palm, C. A. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 146(1-3): 199-209. Maheswarappa, H.P., Palaniswami, C., Dhanapal, R. and Subramanian, P. (2010). Coconut based intercropping and mixed cropping systems. J. Plant. Crops. 37(4): 14-16. Manzeke-Kangara, M. G., Nyamadzawo, G., Nyagumbo, I., and Nyamugafata, P. 2025. Soil organic carbon and related properties under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Front. Soil Sci. 4: 1481275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2024.1481275 Montagnini, F. and Nair, P.K.R. (2004). Carbon sequestration: An under exploited environmental benefits of agro forestry system. Agrofor. Syst. 61(5): 281-288. Nair, S. and Subba Rao N. 1997. Microbiology of the root region of coconut and cacao under mixed cropping. Plant and Soil 46: 511-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015910 Namitha, V. V., Raj, S. K., Jacob, D., Pillai, P. S., Radhakrishnan, N. V., Paramesha, V., and Nath, A. J. 2025. Impact of crop combination and nutrient management on productivity, profitability, and soil health in a coconut-based multistoried cropping system in Kerala, India. Front. sustain. food syst. 9: 1605962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1605962 Naresh, K.S., Kasthuri, B.K.V., and George, J. 2008. A method for non-destructive estimation of dry weight of coconut stem. J. Plant. Crops 36: 296-99. Naveen Kumar, K.S. and Maheswarappa, H.P. 2019. Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based cropping systems under integrated nutrient management practices. J. Plant. Crops 47(2): 107-114. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2019.v47.i2.5776 Nuwarapaksha, N., Silva, R., and Perera, A. 2024. Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based agroforestry systems in Sri Lanka: Spatial and temporal variations. Carbon For. 3(1): 31- 45. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/cf.2024.31 Ozturkmen, A. R., Ramazanoglu, E., Almaca, A., and Çakmakli, M. 2020. Effect of intercropping on soil physical and chemical properties in an olive orchard. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 18(6). Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. (2005). Source book for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Ecol. Appl. 57(2): 45-48. Raveendra, S.A.S.T., Atapattu, A.A.A.J., Senarathne, S.H.S., Ranasinghe, C.S., and Weerasinghe, K.W.L.K. 2017. Evaluation of the carbon sequestration potential of intercropping systems under coconut in Sri Lanka. J.G.E.E. 7(1): 1-7. http://www.cibtech.org/jgee.htm Ranasinghe, C.S. and Silva, L.R.S. (2007). Photosynthetic assimilation, carbohydrates in vegetative organs and carbon removal in nut-producing and sap-producing coconut palms. Cocos. 8(6): 45-57. Shinde, S.S. and Nandgude, S.B. 2024. Soil organic carbon stocks assessment under different land use land cover in Morna Watershed, India using GIS technique. M.J.A.S. 58(3): 342-353. Srinivasan, V., Maheswarappa, H. P., and Lal, R. 2012. Long-term effects of topsoil depth and amendments on particulate and non-particulate carbon fractions in a Miamian soil of Central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 121: 10-17. Tesfahunegn, G. B. and Gebru, T. A. 2020. Variation in soil properties under different cropping and other land-use systems in Dura catchment, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0222476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222476 Walkey, A. and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Digestion method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38. Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., and Lewis, S. L. 2009. Global wood density database. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.in/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=4kA8Vvz2HqLR8Ae7urKABQ#q=global+wood+density+database+zanne
References
Similar Articles
- M. Jayanthi, A. Jerard, S. Sherif, S. Jayasankar, Molecular characterization of somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase (SERK) genes from plum (Prunus salicina) and peach (Prunus persica) , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 71 No. 4 (2014): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- V.R. Sagar, Pritam Kalia, Evaluation of temperate carrot genotypes for quality attributes , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 01 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- P. Dey, Mathura Rai, K.K. Gangopadhyay, Bikash Das, Vishal Nath, N.N. Reddy, Effect of phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient use efficiency of litchi grown on Alfisol , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 67 No. 03 (2010): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Mahesh Kumar Dhakar, Ram Avtar Kaushik, Deepak Sarolia, Mahan Lal Bana, Effect of fertigation using low cost drip irrigation system on physicochemical characteristics in pomegranate cv. Bhagwa , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 67 No. Special Issue (2010): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Sanchita Ghosh, M. Ganga, K. Soorianathasundaram, Ajit Kumar, Manish Kapoor, Induction of mutation in Jasminum grandiflorum with gamma rays and EMS and identification of novel mutants using molecular markers and SEM imaging , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 77 No. 04 (2020): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Firdes Ulas, Alim Aydın, Abdullah Ulas, Halit Yetisir, Rootstock effects on alkali stressed melon plants , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 76 No. 01 (2019): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- R.K. Meena, H.L. Bairwa, L.N. Mahawer, T.C. Mahawar, Response of integrated nutrient management on floral, bulb and economic parameters in tuberose cv. Phule Rajani under sub-humid southern plains of Rajasthan , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 02 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- D. Bisht, P. Chaturvedi, A.K. Gaur, Sunita T. Pandey, Chemical and molecular characterisation of Artemisia annua L. genotypes grown under Tarai conditions of Uttrakhand , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 67 No. 04 (2010): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- S.S. Dey, T.K. Behera, A.D. Munshi, S. Rakshit, R. Bhatia, Utility of gynoecious sex form in heterosis breeding of bitter gourd and genetics of associated vegetative and flowering traits , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 69 No. 04 (2012): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Sanjay K. Singh, Ankit K. Pandey, Prabhakar Singh, Gaseous exchange, biochemical parameters and yield as affected by application techniques and doses of Paclobutrazol in litchi tree , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 76 No. 02 (2019): Indian Journal of Horticulture
<< < 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
