Influence of soil agro-techniques and rootstock on management of apple replant diseases

Published

2023-05-16

Keywords:

Malus × domestica Borkh, biocontrol, PGPR, rootstocks, soil biological activities
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Niranjan Singh Department of Fruit Science, Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan - 173230, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Abstract

The replant problem has shown symptoms of declining productivity and longevity of apple orchards in several apple-growing areas of Himachal Pradesh. Due to limited land and choice of crops for smaller microclimatic niches and incomparable economic equivalence of other fruits with apples, orchardists are compelled to replant old apple orchard sites with apples only. Therefore, standardization of suitable agrotechniques to combat the replant problem in apples for better field survival rate and productivity under replant conditions for the sustainability of the apple industry in the state and another part of the country is necessary. The present investigation was carried out using 20 soil agro-techniques combinations, comprising of four apple rootstocks viz., seedling, Merton 793, MM.111, and M.7, and five different soil agro-techniques namely soil fumigation, PGPR, biocontrol, combined (Soil fumigation + PGPR + Biocontrol) and control with three replications. The data revealed that Merton 793 rootstock improved the plant growth and vigour parameters, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial counts. Among the soil agro-techniques, similar results were recorded in the case of combined soil agro-technique. Furthermore, the interaction between rootstocks and soil agrotechniques revealed that combinations of Merton 793 × combined technique excelled with respect for growth and vigour traits, soil enzymatic activities, and bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes counts over other combinations under replant situation.

How to Cite

Niranjan Singh. (2023). Influence of soil agro-techniques and rootstock on management of apple replant diseases. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 78(4), 392–397. Retrieved from https://journal.iahs.org.in/index.php/ijh/article/view/715

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslantas, R., Cakmakc, R., and Sahin, F. 2007.

Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

on young apple tree growth and fruit yield under

orchard conditions. Scie. Horti. 111: 371-377.

Casida, L., Klein, D. and Santoro, T. 1996. Soil

Dehydrogenase Activity. Soil Sci. 98:371-6.

Gu, Y.H. and Mazzola, M. 2003. Modification

of fluorescent pseudomonad community and

control of apple replant disease induced in a

wheat cultivar-specific manner. App. Soil Eco.

:57-72.

Marschner, P., Yang, C.H., Lieberei, R. and

Crowley, D.E. 2001. Soil and plant specific

effects on bacterial community composition in the

rhizosphere. Soil Bio. Bio. 33:1437-45.

Peterson, A.B. and Hinman, R.H. 1994. The

economics of replanting apple orchards in

Washington state. Acta Hortic. 363:19-23.

Rumberger, A., Yao, S., Merwin, I.A., Nelson,

E.B. and Thies, J.E. 2004. Rootstock genotype

and orchard replant position rather than soil

fumigation or compost amendment determine

tree growth and rhizosphere bacterial community

composition in an apple replant soil. Pla. Soi.

:246–60.

Shengrui, Y., Ian, A.M., George, S., Abawib and

Janice, E.T. 2006. Soil fumigation and compost

amendment alter soil microbial community

composition but do not improve tree growth or

yield in an apple replant site. Soil Biol. Biochem.

:587–99.

Singh, N. and Sharma, D.P. 2017. Soil treatments

and rootstocks against apple replant problem.

Int. J. Chem. Stud. 5:2164-70.

Singh, N., Sharma, D.P. and Thakur, K.K. 2018.

Effect of rootstocks and soil management on

growth and physiological parameters in new

plantations of apple under replant conditions.

Indian. J. Hortic. 75:392-98.

Singh, N., Sharma, D.P., Kaushal, R., Sharma,

N., Sharma, I.M. and Sharma S.S. 2020. Isolation

and identification of fungi and nematodes in the

rhizosphere soil of old declining apple orchards

in Himachal Pradesh, India. Allelo. J. 50:

-52.

Tabatabai, M.A. and Bremner, J.M. 1996. Use

of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil

phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1:

-17.

Thakur, K.K. 2017. Studies on replant problem

in peach. PhD thesis, Dr. Y.S Parmar University

of Horticulture and Forestry Solan Himachal

Pradesh, India.

Tuyler, G. 1974. Heavy metal pollution and soil

enzymatic activity. Plant Soil 41:303–11.

Westwood M.N. 1978. Plant efficiency; growth

and yield mesurments. In: Temperate Zone

Pomology, W H Freeman and company. San

Fran. 119-20.

Wollum, A.G. 1982. Cultural methods for soil

microorganisms. In: Methods of Soil Analysis,

Part II, Chemical and Microbiological properties.

Ame. Soc. Agro. 781-802.

Zhao, M., Li, M. and Liu, R.J. 2010. Effects of

arbuscular mycorrhizae on microbial population

and enzyme activity in replant soil used for

watermelon production, International Journal of

Engineering. Sci. Tech. 2:17-22.

Zhou, L. 1995. Activities of soil enzymes and

heavy metal pollution in soil. J. Env. Sci. 5:

-84.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.