Optimization of in vitro conditions favourable for effective regeneration in Pusa Meghna Indian cauliflower

Published

2020-03-25

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2020.00014.6

Keywords:

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, cole crop, in vitro plant regeneration, hypocotyl, cotyledon.
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Poonam Chaudhary Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Pritam Kalia Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Raghavendra Aminedi Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Shilpi Bansal Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Sanjeev Kumar Division of Vegetable Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012

Abstract

Establishment of an efficient in vitro regeneration system is a pre-requisite for genetic modification of plants. The present study reports a high efficiency regeneration protocol for cauliflower cv. Pusa Meghna using cotyledon and hypocotyl explants cultured on different growth media with varying combinations of plant growth regulators. Maximum shoot regeneration response from hypocotyl (95.76%) and cotyledon (83.01%) was obtained on MS medium containing 1mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L BAP+0.1 mg/L NAA+0.5 mg/L AgNO3+0.1 mg/L GA3, respectively. Further optimization of rooting media for development of full grown plants showed maximum root regeneration of 92.20% and 94.86 % from hypocotyl and cotyledon explants grown on MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L IBA and 0.2 mg/L IBA, respectively. Utilization of the present established regeneration protocol would serve as a valuable tool for various crop improvement studies in cauliflower

How to Cite

Chaudhary, P. ., Kalia, P., Aminedi, R. ., Bansal, S., & Kumar, S. . (2020). Optimization of in vitro conditions favourable for effective regeneration in Pusa Meghna Indian cauliflower. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 77(01), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2020.00014.6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>