Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based intercropping systems under humid tropical conditions of Kerala, India
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.13Keywords:
carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, plantation cropping systems, coconut-based intercroppingIssue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sriyansu Nayak, P. Lincy Davis, B. Ajithkumar, Beena V. I., Sajitha Vijayan M.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In Kerala, India’s humid tropics, coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) plantations dominate the land-use system;Abstract
however, monocropping techniques frequently lead to inefficient use of biomass resources and land.
Introducing perennial plantation crops within the coconut plantation led to enhance the carbon storage and farm
sustainability. This study quantified and compared carbon sequestration potential in coconut monoculture and
coconut-based intercropping systems with cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) under
humid tropical conditions in Kerala, India. The experiment was conducted at Kerala Agricultural University,
Vellanikkara, from September 2024 to September 2025, with five treatments: coconut monocrop (WCT), hybrid
monocrop (Dwarf × Tall), coconut-cocoa, coconut-nutmeg and a non-cropped control. Above ground biomass
was estimated using species-specific allometric equations, while soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured at
0-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm depths. Total carbon stock, obtained by combining above ground and soil carbon,
varied significantly among systems. The coconut-cocoa system recorded the highest total carbon stock (156.79
t ha-1), followed by coconut-nutmeg (110.95 t ha-1), coconut monoculture (82.89 t ha-1) and hybrid monoculture
(72.48 t ha-1), while in non-cropped control recorded only 13.91 t ha-1. SOC declined with depth, with maximum
values in the 0-15 cm layer. Intercropped systems also showed lower bulk density than the non-cropped control,
indicating improved soil physical condition. The results underscore coconut-based intercropping, particularly
with cocoa, as an effective plantation management strategy for enhancing carbon sequestration and promoting
climate-resilient, sustainable coconut production.
How to Cite
Downloads
Bhagya, H.P., Maheswarappa, H.P., Surekha, P. and Bhat, R. (2017). Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based cropping systems. Indian J. Hort. 74(1): 1-5. Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., and Zanne, A. E. 2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12(4): 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x Davis, S.J., Caldeira, K. and Matthews, H.D. (2010). Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Sci. 329(3): 1330-1333. Ghavale, S.L., Shinde, V.V., Wankhede, S.M., Maheswarappa, H.P. and Haldankar, P.M., 2020. Carbon sequestration and productivity potential of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) hybrids and varieties under coastal eco-system of Maharashtra. Current J. Appl. Sci. Techn. 39(22), pp.30-37. Ketterings, Q. M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau, Y., and Palm, C. A. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 146(1-3): 199-209. Maheswarappa, H.P., Palaniswami, C., Dhanapal, R. and Subramanian, P. (2010). Coconut based intercropping and mixed cropping systems. J. Plant. Crops. 37(4): 14-16. Manzeke-Kangara, M. G., Nyamadzawo, G., Nyagumbo, I., and Nyamugafata, P. 2025. Soil organic carbon and related properties under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Front. Soil Sci. 4: 1481275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2024.1481275 Montagnini, F. and Nair, P.K.R. (2004). Carbon sequestration: An under exploited environmental benefits of agro forestry system. Agrofor. Syst. 61(5): 281-288. Nair, S. and Subba Rao N. 1997. Microbiology of the root region of coconut and cacao under mixed cropping. Plant and Soil 46: 511-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015910 Namitha, V. V., Raj, S. K., Jacob, D., Pillai, P. S., Radhakrishnan, N. V., Paramesha, V., and Nath, A. J. 2025. Impact of crop combination and nutrient management on productivity, profitability, and soil health in a coconut-based multistoried cropping system in Kerala, India. Front. sustain. food syst. 9: 1605962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1605962 Naresh, K.S., Kasthuri, B.K.V., and George, J. 2008. A method for non-destructive estimation of dry weight of coconut stem. J. Plant. Crops 36: 296-99. Naveen Kumar, K.S. and Maheswarappa, H.P. 2019. Carbon sequestration potential of coconut-based cropping systems under integrated nutrient management practices. J. Plant. Crops 47(2): 107-114. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2019.v47.i2.5776 Nuwarapaksha, N., Silva, R., and Perera, A. 2024. Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based agroforestry systems in Sri Lanka: Spatial and temporal variations. Carbon For. 3(1): 31- 45. https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/cf.2024.31 Ozturkmen, A. R., Ramazanoglu, E., Almaca, A., and Çakmakli, M. 2020. Effect of intercropping on soil physical and chemical properties in an olive orchard. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 18(6). Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. (2005). Source book for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Ecol. Appl. 57(2): 45-48. Raveendra, S.A.S.T., Atapattu, A.A.A.J., Senarathne, S.H.S., Ranasinghe, C.S., and Weerasinghe, K.W.L.K. 2017. Evaluation of the carbon sequestration potential of intercropping systems under coconut in Sri Lanka. J.G.E.E. 7(1): 1-7. http://www.cibtech.org/jgee.htm Ranasinghe, C.S. and Silva, L.R.S. (2007). Photosynthetic assimilation, carbohydrates in vegetative organs and carbon removal in nut-producing and sap-producing coconut palms. Cocos. 8(6): 45-57. Shinde, S.S. and Nandgude, S.B. 2024. Soil organic carbon stocks assessment under different land use land cover in Morna Watershed, India using GIS technique. M.J.A.S. 58(3): 342-353. Srinivasan, V., Maheswarappa, H. P., and Lal, R. 2012. Long-term effects of topsoil depth and amendments on particulate and non-particulate carbon fractions in a Miamian soil of Central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 121: 10-17. Tesfahunegn, G. B. and Gebru, T. A. 2020. Variation in soil properties under different cropping and other land-use systems in Dura catchment, Northern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0222476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222476 Walkey, A. and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Digestion method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38. Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., and Lewis, S. L. 2009. Global wood density database. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.in/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=4kA8Vvz2HqLR8Ae7urKABQ#q=global+wood+density+database+zanne
References
Similar Articles
- S. Mishra, M.R. Choudhary, B.L. Yadav, S.P. Singh, Studies on the response of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of ber , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 68 No. 03 (2011): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- S.J. Ankegowda, Impact of irrigation on cardamom production , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 68 No. 04 (2011): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Anjali Soni, Jai Prakash, S.K. Singh, A.K. Goswami, N.C. Gupta, A.K. Singh, Efficacy of gene-based markers associated with sex expression in papaya , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 03 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Mohammad Nasar, Md. Abu Kausar, Md Abu Nayyer, Vikash Kumar, Md. Arshad Anwer, The Explainable AI for mango leaf disease detection: bridging the gap between model accuracy and farmers usability , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 82 No. 03 (2025): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Kalpana Motha, S.K. Singh, Rakesh Singh, Chet Ram, Manish Srivastav, M.K. Verma, M. Alizadeh, Ch. Bhardwaj, Rahul Dev, Comparative in vitro propagation of stress tolerant grape (Vitis spp.) rootstocks and assessment of clonal fidelity of plantlets , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 03 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- S. S. Rathore, Kapila Shekhawat, Shrawan Singh, Shri Dhar, Integrated nutrient management for enhancement of productivity, profitability and nutrient usages in cauliflower-onion system , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 79 No. 1 (2022): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- P.R. Meghwal, Arvind Kumar, Suresh Kumar, Performance of cactus pear at two geographical locations in Indian arid zone , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 75 No. 01 (2018): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- A.K Dubey, Manish Srivastav, Charanjit Kaur, Variation of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) accessions in India and identification of high yielding types , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 71 No. 03 (2014): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Masood Ahmad, Pramod Kumar, Uday Sharma, Pratibha Chib, Generative traits of litchi (Litchi × chinensis Sonn.) cultivars in Shiwalik foothills of North-West Himalayas , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 81 No. 02 (2024): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- A.K. Sangwan, W.S. Dhillon, H. Singh, N.P. Singh, S.K. Chohan, P.P.S. Gill, Influence of horti-silviculture combinations on pre-bearing growth and physiological parameters of pear , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 01 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
<< < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
